Rising Times

The Home News & Times blog

Follow the Money

 

My Good Friend Yonkers Confidential has returned with another great piece–DJM

 

Follow the Money

 

by Yonkers Confidential

 

Everyone is waiting for the next shoe to drop in the ongoing U.S. Attorney’s Public Integrity investigation into Yonkers and Westchester County. A few tidbits that might be interesting to those who follow Westchester politics.

 

THE RIDGE HILL CIRCLE

New York Times reporter Alison Leigh Cowan confirmed in a 2008 column, through an agent involced in the federal investigation, that Ridge Hill lobbyist Al Pirro had a conversation in February of 2005 with former Yonkers Councilman Dennis Robertson during which Pirro expressed confidence that he could win Sandy Annabi’s support for the Ridge Hill project as long as he made Yonkers Republican Chairman Zehy Jereis happy. Mr. Robertson was subsequently questioned in 2008 by federal prosecutors about this wiretapped conversation.

 

To get the Ridge Hill deal done, Pirro needed to engage Senator Nick Spano, Zehy Jereis’ ‘political handler.’ After a conversation, the deal was struck. Nick would have his brother, Assemblyman Mike, take a temporary leave from the NYS Assembly and join the Pat Lynch’s lobbying firm, guaranteeing that Nick got paid for his efforts – at an arm’s length, of course, because he was still a NYS Senator. Nick Spano was very close to Shelly Silver, Lynch’s former boss. And Silver still owed Spano for clearing the way to make Silver’s boyhood pal, Jonathan Lippman, the Chief Judge of the NYS Court of Appeals.

 

Mike Spano, now a Lynch lobbyist, introduced Zehy Jereis to Ratner’s Bruce Bender and continued to massage the relationship, knowing full well about the payment that would be made to Annabi to get her vote on the project. Bender made a deal with Jereis, contingent upon getting Annabi’s support for Ridge Hill, that would pay him a $60,000 consulting contract. When the vote was taken in July of 2006, everyone got paid, and Mike Spano returned to the NYS Assembly in 2008. This is the criminal conspiracy that is at the heart of the Ridge Hill investigation.

 

Although Al Pirro obviously believed that Jereis was the conduit to get Annabi’s vote, others apparently felt another middleman could be just as successful with Annabi. The question that remains is: Who was it that steered the Milio Brothers to Anthony Mangone to secure Sandy’s vote on Longfellow/School 6 project?

 

THE PAYMENTS

From the Criminal indictment, USA v. Sandy Annabi, Zehy Jereis and Anthony Mangone…

“Since at least 2004, ANNABI has received from JEREIS, MANGONE, and others more than $160,00 worth of secret payments designed to influence and reward her for favorable official action or inaction on matters pending before the City Council as specific opportunities arose. ANNABI, JERIES, and MANGONE also took various steps to conceal their scheme, by making false statements and/or omitting required information in various reporting documents.”

 

This best the question: Who were the others alluded to in the indictment who were making these ongoing bribe payments to Annabi? Between 2004 and 2008, Zehy Jereis either wrote personal checks or money orders, or made various cash payments for Sandy Annabi, totaling over $130,000. And this was in addition to the $30,000 payment from Milio Brothers Management, through Anthony Mangone, regarding the Longfellow development bribe.

 

It is obvious that Zehy Jereis was merely the conduit for these bribes. So who was it that was making these payments, and what other projects were on the table in addition to Ridge Hill and Longfellow?

 

This will be answered in the next round of federal indictments. Coming very soon.

 

 

December 13, 2010 - Posted by | Politics

37 Comments »

  1. If memory serves us correctly it was then Yonkers Mayor John Spencer, either in late 2002 or early 2003, who hired Al Pirro as the City’s official lobbyist at an annual salary of $200,000 to bring developers to the proposed $1.3 billion downtown revitalization project. I suppose we have the Spencer/Amicone team to thank for bringing “Mr. Fixit” to the party.

    Could it be they were feeling sorry for Al. After all, he had just gotten out of the federal slammer a year earlier after managing to shave 18 months off his sentence with a bogus claim of substance abuse. Let’s not lose sight of the fact that both Spencer and Amicone assumed executive positions in the City’s IDA.

    Then too, one might wonder how Al proceeded to show his gratitude. When you’re married to the DA there’s no telling what unusual ways you may choose to express your appreciation. But we digress.

    Comment by A. Truman | December 13, 2010

  2. yonkers confidential has been correct in some other posts and i hope he is correct here

    Comment by bobby | December 13, 2010

  3. CAN NICK AND LEIBELL SHARE A BUNK IN THE PEN? WHO GETS THE TOP BUNK? KEEP IT COMING MURPHY

    Comment by GENE | December 13, 2010

  4. who can answer the two questions in this interesting post. who put Ridge Hill and Zehy together, and who gave Zehy the $130 grand to give to Sandy. I don’t know but would love to find out.

    Comment by Carole | December 13, 2010

  5. wishing the Spano’s a happy holiday season

    Comment by king ralph | December 13, 2010

  6. I hope Murphy goes to jail for the crap that he writes, and Yonkers confidential is nothing but a Spano hater. Maybe Murphy and confidential can share a jail cell someday. Despite your constant negative attacks, Mike Spano will be the next Yonkers Mayor.

    Comment by yonkers gop'er | December 14, 2010

  7. I agree that Dan Murphy has gone over the top in some of the nonsense he writes about the Spanos. Funny that he makes up stuff about the spanos but he will never write anything on the Amicone administration and he doesnt need to make anything up there. I hope Nick sues you.

    Comment by Amicone press? | December 14, 2010

  8. .. and this is one lame web site.

    Comment by J | December 14, 2010

  9. The feds know who put Bender and Zehy together, either Zehy or Bender have flipped and told them.

    Comment by Jack | December 14, 2010

  10. Whoever got paid on Ridge Hill gave the $$$ to Sandy

    Hey Murph anything on DiPietro?

    Comment by court watcher | December 14, 2010

  11. Some of you guys sound like you love the Spano Corruption Team, or that you have been on the receiving end of their patronage and manipulation of election outcomes, not to mention how happy you are to be paying the salaries of “no-show” hacks and hoodlums in City Hall; $1.7 million worth following Nick’s endorsement of the Mayor, and on baby brother Mikey’s payroll to the tune of $300,000 of our tax dollars.

    Fact is, Dan has been doing a better job lately of uncovering the slime and larceny eating away at our home values and personal resources only to line the pockets of arrogant thieving politicians protected by the likes of Janet DiFiore and Michael Garcia for far too long now.

    Comment by A. Truman | December 15, 2010

  12. Truman – name the 1.8 million doallrs in salaries at city hall and the 300,000 in Mikes office. You cant because its not true. easy to sit behind a monitor and make stuff up easiest it. the time for you to act was in the election where Mike pounded his opponment into the groung. is it hard being a bottom feeder?

    Comment by 62% of the vote for MIKE | December 15, 2010

  13. please stop attempting to implicate janet
    difiore and michael garcia in whatever larcenous behavior you think is going on
    in westchester…she just proved she couldnt
    care less about political connections when
    she prosecuted adam bradley succesfully i
    might add…you home values are sliding
    because there was a housing bubble that
    had nothing to do with prosecutors..it had
    everthing to do with lending to sub prime
    mortgage applicants who could not pay back
    their loans…and it had everything to do
    with certain wall street bigshots who created
    synthetic derivatives to place huge bets on
    housing..to attempt to blame difiore for
    this is quite a stretch.the same stretch
    that richard blassberg engaged in for years
    as editor of the guardian…create out of
    whole cloth conspiracy scenarios in order
    to sell newspapers..what garbage

    Comment by anon | December 15, 2010

  14. What happened to the Westchester Guardian…They have ignored some of the biggest cases going on in Westchester…Is Blassberg still there?

    Comment by Gary | December 15, 2010

  15. blassberg is gone…abady took his place
    and now he is gone…hezi aris is the
    new editor in chief and is doing an
    excellent job…you cannot cover a “big”
    case without confirmation that there is
    an ongoing investigation or other information
    that can be verified..unlike the poster above
    who hurls spears without regard to the facts

    Comment by anon | December 15, 2010

  16. In response to poster #12 Mikey boy had Steve Levy, Gail Burns, and his squeeze Gina on the payroll for a total of more than $300,000 with benefits.

    Phil Amicone in exchange for Big Nick’s endorsement brought in some 30 of Nick’s former employees to the tune of $1.7 million with benefits.

    And, oh yes, we have it on good authority that Mikey boy was shredding documents for more than a week in anticipation of the Feds.

    Any other questions?

    Comment by A. Truman | December 15, 2010

  17. So, Mike Edelman believes that Janet’s unavoidable prosecution of control freak Adam Bradley for domestic violence makes her “Kosher For Passover.” Wow.

    Firstly, Bradley is an insignificant player, posing no particular political threat to Janet as compared to what her failure to stand up for Fumiko in the domestic violence arena might have meant in the minds of voters, particularly women, all over the County.

    Secondly, Mike, following in the wake of Jeanine, whose propaganda machine perpetually made her out to be a women’s advocate, and despising Jeanine as she does, what choice did Janet have?

    Let’s see her go after Ken Jenkins who is pulling an “Espada” living in Legislative District #15 and claiming to live in and represent District #16, a blatant Election Fraud, a felony punishable by Four Years in Prison and a $5,000 fine for each count, and then we might accept the notion that she pays no attention to politics in protecting the law from violation by arrogant scum.

    Comment by A. Truman | December 15, 2010

  18. ken jenkins is allowed to declare a “residency” anywhere he likes…to be
    distinguished from a domocile for tax
    purposes…you can have as many residences
    as you want but only one domocile..the
    election law requires you to be a resident
    in the district..so it would seem ken is
    in compliance with thelaw…your continued
    diatribe against difiore is unfortunate
    don’t try to conflate her with her predescessor…she is not responsible for
    anything you think jeanine did or did not
    do…your characterization of the bradley
    prosecution as unavoidable is typical
    blassberg..you set up the straw man and
    you knock it down for your own purposes.
    and everyone sees through it

    Comment by anon | December 16, 2010

  19. Steve Levy was never on Mikes pay roll, Gina? thats a made up person. and what 30 ppl in city hall? you still cant answer the question. Just lies as usual from a complete bottom feeder with no facts to back up ur words

    Comment by Easy on Dan | December 16, 2010

  20. Not Gina… Denise, Mike’s Chief of Staff, has been “taking care of him” for years. That being said, who really cares? As long as the job is done it shouldn’t matter who any of these people sleep with.

    Comment by who cares | December 16, 2010

  21. The question is what “job is getting done?”
    Certainly not the People’s Business. Most often monkey business.

    If he was on the level, what in Hell was all the shredding about? This is information coming straight out of the office.

    You don’t know the half of it. Furthermore, just because you are one of the boys, don’t assume most Yonkers resident taxpayers are happy to fund Little Brother’s BS Lifestyle.

    Make no mistake about it; the Spano Brothers are in deep poop.

    Comment by A. Truman | December 16, 2010

  22. AGAIN TRUMAN – STILL WAITING FOR THAT LIST OF 30 PEOPLE AND TO THE PPL THAT SUGGEST THAT DENISE DOESNT DO HER JOB OR DOES OTHER JOBS – U SHLD BE CAREFULL WHAT YOU WRITE, U MAY END UP BEING SUED. TRUMAN SHREDDING – YOU ARE LAUGHABLE GUY! MIKE IS THE MOST HONEST PERSON I KNOW AND THE PPL OF YONKERS FEEL THE SAME. MIKES THE NEXT MAYOR, DEAL WITH IT

    Comment by MAYOR IS BAD | December 17, 2010

  23. Tik Tok Tik Tok Tik Tok

    Comment by All Aboard | December 17, 2010

  24. LEVITT & KAIZER are working hard meeting with people (figure it out) for Nick Spano. WHY??? Mike defend this scumbag!

    Comment by Preet Bharara is sexy | December 17, 2010

  25. Mike Eldman has been protecting the Pirro clan for years. He is a crook of truth, as he “swayed” westchester’s media for years. He is like the middle of an oreo cookie that was squashed between Jeanine Pirro and Jeanine Rose. He can not help himself, but to stick to both sides. Otherwise, he just would be nothing!

    Comment by B. Fooled | December 17, 2010

  26. protecting the pirro clan? that’s a good
    one…edelman is known for his objective
    commentary regardless of where the cookie
    crumbles

    Comment by anon | December 18, 2010

  27. Is Mary Calvi that stupid? Denise Egiziaco has been Mike Spano’s ho,ho,ho for years. Go ahead and get the ho discount from Nick Spano’s attorney, the one he is using for his indictment. Hope you get a ho lot of presents for being naughty. Ho! Ho! Ho

    Comment by Santa | December 18, 2010

  28. See you in court Santa. this a public blog and you said some pretty strong things. hopw mu can back them up and hope u have money for a lawyer

    Comment by thats a mistake | December 19, 2010

  29. The truth is always a defense in a defamation action. Besides it would be interesting to hear the testimony in a lawsuit alleging marital infidelity involving public officials such as Mike Spano.

    The Spanos are known to be of limited intelligence but thay can’t be that dumb. If so, perhaps their pride and joy of the legal world, Anthony Mangone, might prosecute the case for them – if he ever gets out of jail.

    Comment by Serve the Summons ASAP | December 21, 2010

  30. its really too bad that blogs have become
    respository’s for the very worst in people’s
    nature..it seems that there is a rush to
    condemn those who people who they don’t
    like or against whom they have a political
    grudge..its possibly why most people don’t
    participate..because rather than having
    a legitimate discussion about issues..the
    conversation disintegrates in personal spear
    chucking..

    Comment by anon | December 21, 2010

  31. Please sue!. A lot of us want to see Mike on the stand up front and center. GO AHEAD MAKE OUR DAY! PLEEEEEEASE! This is going to be great!

    Comment by Suerendezvue | December 21, 2010

  32. Mike, what’s that old bromide about PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES?

    Comment by A. Truman | December 21, 2010

  33. DENISE EGIZIACIO, 60.52 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 3,000.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 1,034.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 598.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 591.49 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 548.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 535.03 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 446.60 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 400.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 320.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 305.72 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 249.40 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 235.40 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 198.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 158.40 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 135.98 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 102.35 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 87.70 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 87.23 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 70.05 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 66.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 48.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 39.69 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 35.92 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 35.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 34.06 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 30.99 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 23.71 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 20.35 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 500.00 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO
    DENISE EGIZIACO 887.34 FRIENDS OF MIKE SPANO

    Comment by ho lotta money | December 21, 2010

  34. It’s not uncommon for people to receive reimbursement for money spent on expenses for a campaign. You conveniently left out what the purpose of the expenses were.

    Comment by Whatever man | December 22, 2010

  35. the above statment of funds being paid
    is indicative of nada…denise is allowed
    to on her own time work for any campaign
    she wants to..clearly the lower numbers
    were reimbursement of expenses..and the large
    ones appear to be fees for work done…
    so what

    Comment by anon | December 23, 2010

  36. Even I who have posted some not too nice things about Nick and company do not see the above campaign expenses as inappropriate. I will reserve decision on the other accusations.

    Comment by nomorespanos | December 24, 2010

  37. I every time emailed this webpage post page to all my friends, since if like to read it afterward my links will too.||Can you please send an e-mail to me the code for this script or please let know me in detail in relation to this script?||Your method of explaining the whole thing in this article is truly nice, all be capable of easily understand it, Thanks a lot.

    Comment by Jay | December 23, 2011


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.